A Pox On You?
So this was a bit of a surprise to me - people offering to sell chicken-pox infected (or supposedly infected) items so that other parents can expose their children to the illness and develop immunity early on rather than later in life - and bypass the immunization process.
What's equally surprising is the vagueness of the article as a whole. Such practices were "common" as little as 15 years ago or so? What does "common" mean? I certainly never heard of such a practice, despite growing up without the vaccine and contracting chicken pox in high school. If it was common, how is it now equated with a medieval mindset?
The final quote is the one I find most curious - "vigilante vaccination". Taking responsibility for your health is now equated with the illegal assumption of law enforcement powers? There's no way I'd pay to have my children lick a lollipop from a total stranger to contract chicken pox, but I certainly am uneasy with equating the expectation that health care decisions can be made (to a certain extent, at least) by non-medical individuals with an illegal practice to be disquieting, at best.
Comments